Danielle / YouTube screenshot
ADOR has secured a court-approved asset freeze tied to the ongoing legal dispute surrounding NewJeans, marking a significant escalation in the high-profile case involving former executive Min Hee-jin and the family of member Danielle.
According to Yonhap News report on April 29, the Seoul Central District Court approved ADOR’s request earlier this year to place provisional seizures on real estate owned by Danielle’s mother and Min Hee-jin. The decision, made on February 2, was only recently disclosed.
Court backs asset preservation request
The court’s approval allows ADOR to temporarily restrict the sale or transfer of the properties in question. This legal measure, known as a provisional seizure, is typically granted to prevent potential disposal or concealment of assets ahead of a final ruling in a civil case.
ADOR filed the request on January 23, seeking to secure assets totaling approximately 7 billion KRW (around $5 million USD). Of that amount, roughly 2 billion KRW is tied to Danielle’s mother, while 5 billion KRW is linked to Min Hee-jin.
The move suggests ADOR is preparing for potential financial claims tied to the broader dispute. The label has maintained that both parties bear responsibility for disruptions involving NewJeans’ activities, including member departures and delays in group operations.
Expanding legal battle over contracts and damages
The asset freeze is part of a larger legal conflict between ADOR and individuals connected to the group. In December last year, ADOR terminated Danielle’s exclusive contract and filed a damages lawsuit reportedly worth over 43 billion KRW.
The company argues that actions taken by Danielle’s side and Min Hee-jin contributed significantly to instability within the group, prompting financial and operational setbacks. ADOR has stated its intent to pursue accountability through legal channels.
The case is currently being reviewed by a civil division of the Seoul Central District Court, the same court that previously ruled in favor of Min Hee-jin in a separate first-instance lawsuit related to a shareholder agreement dispute involving HYBE.
Legal representation shift adds uncertainty
In a further development, ADOR’s legal team submitted a resignation notice to the court on April 24, just weeks before the first hearing scheduled for mid-May. The reason for the withdrawal has not been publicly disclosed, adding another layer of uncertainty to an already complex case.
The evolving dispute continues to draw attention across the K-pop industry, given NewJeans’ global prominence and the involvement of key figures behind the group’s creative and management direction.
As legal proceedings move forward, the outcome could carry broader implications for artist contracts, agency authority, and dispute resolution within the rapidly expanding K-pop business landscape.
Park Minji is a K‑pop writer and journalist who delivers sharp insights and engaging stories on Korean music and culture for global readers.
📧 Contact: trustdouble@naver.com
Comments